Cameron v Commissioner of Taxation

Cameron v Commissioner of Taxation

Sub-trust interest, the assumption that was not tested, and the onus problem 1. Cameron v Commissioner of Taxation[cm_simple_footnote id=”1″] decides two things: interest on a sub-trust loan was not deductible under s 8-1 because the supposed borrowing was...
Development Company Structures and Why PCG 2026/D2 Is Wrong

Development Company Structures and Why PCG 2026/D2 Is Wrong

Development Company Structures and Why PCG 2026/D2 Is Wrong  In my view the PCG is wrong. It misreads the substantive law. It assumes facts that are not true of the arrangements it targets. It offers an alternative postulate that is not an alternative postulate.  This...
Sub Trusts – Part 2

Sub Trusts – Part 2

To view Failed Asset Protection article please click the “read more” button. Failed Asset Protection by Cartland Law | April 8, 2024 | Adrian Cartland, Failed Asset Protection, Latest News, Payments, Succession Planning, Tax, Trust, Trust Problems | 0...
Failed Asset Protection

Failed Asset Protection

Notwithstanding that a promissory note is a relatively simple instrument, it may be drawn incorrectly. Examples of this are Re Permewan [26] and Turner v O’Bryan-Turner, [27] both of which involved a “gift and loan back” scheme. A further analysis of these cases is...
Why I Hate Your Sub-Trust

Why I Hate Your Sub-Trust

There is a certain type of sub-trust over income that many trust deeds purport to create, and which the Federal Commissioner purports to allow. This is where a trust is established over the income distributed from another trust. This is problematic for the reasons...