Fischer V Nemeske: The Dissenting Judgements – Part 3 Kiefel J’s Dissent This is the final part of my three part series commenting on Fischer V Nemeske, specifically the dissenting judgements. Kiefel J considered that for the capital to be applied,...
Analysis of Fischer v Nemeske: Gageler J’s Judgement Continuing on from part one of the discussion on Fischer v Nemeske, in which the conventional view of present entitlement and the controversial majority judgement of French CJ and Bell was...
Present Entitlement and Fischer V Nemeske – Part 1 This is part 1 of my three-part series commenting on present entitlement and Fischer V Nemeske. To understand the effect of a resolution to make a beneficiary presently entitled to a sum, with a...
Following recent revenue guidance crackdown upon and given amnesty to medical practices who have not been paying payroll tax on contractors, there have been several proposals for a change of practice models in order to not pay payroll tax on the receipts of doctors...
1. There is the possibility to change the nature of newly constructed residential developments from new residential premises which are taxable supplies to non-new residential premises which are input taxed supplies however there will be adjustments to input tax...
Disneyland Service For Lawyers Disneyland promotes itself as the happiest place on Earth. But it is not happy simply because it has a collection of entertaining rides and activities. Any showground might have that. Nor is it the particular intellectual property of...
